The Sexual Relationship With Self

The Sexual Relationship With Self

The sexual relationship with self is a widely experienced part of adolescent and adult development. It’s a simple enough phrase, and people tend to make some instant sense of what it means. It differentiates eroticism/sex between its internal and external nature, simply and quickly. Saying it implies its ‘opposite’ – sexual relationship-with-other(s) (a subject near and dear to psychotherapy.)

An Erotic/ Sexual Battle Royal

Except they’re not true opposites. Yet that’s how some partners, in some relationships, view sex-with-self: as the opposing force to sex-with-others, and meager by comparison. I see sex-with-self as the platform on which sex-with-other(s) is built. It’s a precursor, not a curse. And it’s a lifetime companion and wellspring of imagination for partnered sex.

Eroticism Is Part Of Self

But it’s more than that, because it’s part of self. Often enough, people want to occupy personal/private sexuality, sometimes to re-energize their sex-with-other(s). But for many, a partner’s sex-with-self is a betrayal, cause for suspicion, even a sign that the sex connection has died.

It’s Ours And We’ll Protect It

The relationship-with-self can be altered by sexual coercion, deception, abuse or violence. Even if undisturbed these ways, it’s still a psychologically, emotionally and physically turbulent place. But it’s ours, and it grows –  like any part of us that is subjected to both indulgence and frustration. This is an early personal/private crucible of psycho-sexual development. And we will protect it, if we can, from shame.

Ongoing Experience of Sexuality

The basic concept is unremarkable. Many people maintain (usually from adolescence on) a conscious intermittent awareness of sex and desire, regardless of happiness or fulfillment. It’s also well established that people, through masturbation, can have a sexual experience and erotic identity, sans partner(s). But socially, it’s shamed.

Even with eroticized cultures, and gender re-definition, most of us developed during adolescence an internal sexual world. The challenge is to take whatever level of ‘fullness’ and integration, and extend it out – to develop it well with other(s).


Map Of A Journey Of Love

It reflects how we were loved, nurtured, and injured. We journey (if safely enough), and start to draw a ‘map’ and an ‘arousal template’. These are used to increase our chances for pleasure, by playing out ways to decrease (usually) our specific anxieties. For some, this can mean mastering anxiety by re-enacting it in a controlled way (BDSM).

Since the erotic map can also lead us in a spiritual direction, it grows with us as we age. This is adult eroticism.

Doesn’t Play Well With Others?

Yet the elementary construct, sex-with-self, does not have an ‘easy relationship’ with its counterpart – sexual relationship(s) with others. )

Other variations include: people struggling to actually do what they privately fantasize about (with any partner, though usually a primary); the idea of observing partner masturbation (to heighten & share pleasure); partners who can only orgasm when masturbating, either before, during or after partner sex, privately or not; and last but not least, taking a partner’s use of pornography personally.

The Self Is A Safe Place

I’ve met a good number of men who ejaculate faster than they want during partner sex. They have the problem much less often during sex-with-themselves (self-stimulation). There is something soothing about being in the safe place of one’s imagination, even with repetitive fantasies. It allows for kinky play, on the erotic map, using various templates. It’s true that a good number of porn users choose fantasy over the challenges of bringing them into reality.

Breach Of Agreement?

But does sex-with-self’s existence, beyond some bare minimum, also violate a prior and superior commitment – to the relationship-with-other? That relationship, in monogamous terms at least, usualy requires an exclusive contract for sexual engagement.

Threat Posed By The Inferior

In many committed relationships, the relationship-with-self is presumed (not openly, usually) to take an inferior or secondary status to the relationship-with-other. If the relationship-with-self occupies increasing amounts of time or interest, it becomes a threat to the prevailing sexual order. A relationship-with-self is by definition self-involved; and, that’s compounded when it’s hidden or shamed.

[Yes, I’ve also worked with folks who have passionate relationships with both self and other(s). And who see the two relationships in a constant alliance throughout adulthood. That helps define ‘sex-positive‘]

An Adolescent Regression

If anything, sex-with-self is seen as a regression, back to adolescent fantasies of compliant/kinky figurines that make no demands. It comes across as a failure to fully engage in committed relationship or “true monogamy.” And a vague sense of betrayal, that a partner has checked out from the once mutual journey.

Development Not Seen

The erotic/sexual relationship-with-self is rarely seen in a developmental way, as the result of a crucible – of self, personality, culture – seeking aliveness. And evidently, a source of safety which allows pleasure. And therefore containing the seeds of renewal into the relationship-with-other.

Individuality & Togetherness

So sex-with-self has a big picture, about the tension between individuality (sense of self) and connection to others (togetherness), expressed erotically & sexually. Both are core elements of individuality-seeking-aliveness. This view fits within a developmental (non-pathologic) view of human sexuality.

Safe To Explore

Ideally, our sexuality begins with imaginative self-exploration. It’s the default safe place (or at least should be) for the birth of the sexual self.

sexual relationship cradle

It’s mutually reinforced, or not, in the body.  It seeks fundamental aliveness, sustained with meaning and pleasure – with other(s). This is eros – attraction. And it begins with a maturity process: self-love & acceptance empowering love towards others. Eros “bridges” our complex internal, private world with those of others, in the matter of experiencing and generating pleasure, meaning and bonding. [Many view eros as the bridge to deep attachment. As in, wanting-before-choosing]

Unusual Even-Handedness

The relationship with self is not better or worse than the one(s) with other(s). They co-exist, typically in the back and forth/ebb and flow that marks all development processes. The ongoing experience of sex-with-self and with others mutually enriches and heals both. It may lead to greater courage in being truly intimate.

Unless it doesn’t. It can become stuck like any other development process.

Therapy Thoughts

Stuck Either Way

Anxiety can get fixated on partner sex, or on sex-with-self. I’ve worked with relationships that have gone in either direction. Repetitive/compulsive behaviors reflect self-involvement over growth. I try to see why.

You can say sex with-other is normal and with-self is not, but I don’t think that will help. Problems with integrity are often about people trading it away, for the (relative) safety of minimizing shame.

When it’s well out of balance, it usually means basic or standard difficulties in personal and relational differentiation. This helps the couple develop greater immunity to anxiety, and promotes collaborating in a non-pathologic frame.

The Impact On Relationship

We are not just talking about the impact of a self-involved sexuality on a relationship. How many times have you heard that a partner seeks refuge from the constant advances of the other partner? How they want “alone time”? The problem can distance partners that way, or through a sexual self that is too private/protected.

Integrity, Empathy, Anxiety

Issues of integrity often assert themselves, making new positions or stances harder to establish. Empathy, and the hope needed to heal the relationship, can seem in short supply. Sexuality is a very effective delivery mechanism for anxiety, and its powerful subsidiary, shame.


The truth is that self-involvement can directly impact relational life. It’s hard to bear that a partner withheld connection, preferring to self-pleasure, and is/was willing to hide it away indefinitely. This strikes at the heart of desire, and at the vulnerability of monogamy. I could say ‘fragility’ too, as in, how the more ‘normal’ sex-with-others referred to above is hyper-sensitive to how lowly/immoral sex-with-self seems subversive.

Grieving & Self-Soothing

Sexuality is for many people a drive wheel of the relationship, even if they’ve not paid much attention to it. But a first step in healing this must be to recognize the hurt and pain in the relationship.

Sex & Relationships: Why Desire Is Fragile

Sexual Desire

Sexual desire, arousal and lust are powerful and alluring, so why is desire fragile? . Whether one believes one’s life to be erotically blessed and indulged, or deprived and wounded, it’s hard not to see that desire (and arousal) is still the most robust ways to feel ‘alive’ – or ‘dead.’ Also the most fragile, vulnerable, perilous… and easily thrown “off course.”


The Medical & Physical

What makes desire and arousal so difficult is often unrelated to physical or medical causes, While we should investigate the medical side, It sometimes means we are delaying a deeper, uncomfortable intimacy with ourselves and partner(s).

It isn’t that doctors shouldn’t touch this issue. But they should generally refer to a mental health professional trained in this area of human experience and mental health.  Only in isolated cases is desire or arousal, in all of its complexities, improved by medications.

Desire is Fragile

This simple idea – the fragility of desire – is not so novel. Some act as though this part of relationship can be deferred and subordinated to other ‘necessities’. Others will say it’s not that relevant to the outcome of a marriage.  Until you consider that many, many relationships – full of successful attachments of all kinds (marriage, careers, children, property,  in-laws, etc.) – struggle to maintain desire, arousal and real wanting, and fail for those reasons.

Desire Has It Tough

The day-to-day environment for desire is very adverse. Many of everyday life’s relentless, necessities, and the ways that our primary relationship(s) are run by them, have a negative effect on desire. It’s not only about conflict over priorities.  Desire and arousal are not great “competitors.” against the endless maintaining & developing of work/career, health, money, in-laws & extended family, property and parenting. Many relationships experience a meltdown when desire and work cross paths; the workplace affair is very destabilizing.

Desire Isn’t How The World Mostly Works

The world is not built on the same rules that desire plays by. Unlike the rest of human affairs, arousal and desire thrive in a tension of partners’ loving selfishness, separateness, aggression and willfulness. The rest of life’s relationships – which thrive on cooperation, compromise and predictability – would be havoc if they played by those rules. Yet this is why people so often want erotic and sexual lives; they can safely escape constraints and boundaries that relationships normally require, through consensual play and imagination.

Desire doesn't work this way

Desire doesn’t work this way

Teamwork vs. Differentiation

A relationship is often caught up in the accomodating teamwork that modern life can demand. Predictability, agreeability, accountability and equality are the standards that daily life is held to; as few surprises as possible. An ‘adequate’ sex life, employing an agreed-on (even silently) scripted sexual routine, functional, somewhat mutual & generous, may already exist. It’s a collaborative and serviceable arrangement, until it isn’t.

Desire-Arousal-Intimacy Can Be Threatening & Subversive

People so often develop relationships that are bound and obligated, but where they have little to no desire for one another. Desire, and increasing intimacy, actually threaten to subvert or re-organize the attachment they have built. The relationship may be quite rich, ‘successful’ and warm – but rarely if ever “hot.”

The ability to self-validate one’s own sexual character or nature requires both personal and relational differentiation. It takes the courage to be seen in ways that might be very vulnerable and anxiety-provoking (often due to fear of rejection), even in a long-term relationship. You cannot easily soothe a partner who thinks you are erotically threatening or sexually dangerous.

Unfortunate Beliefs

The non-erotic aspect of most of life’s maintenance tasks serves those who do not welcome ongoing development of their world of desire. It’s often seen as the part of the relationship that “naturally decreases.”  Yet their erotic imaginations – the safer, private erotic relationship with themselves – continue on however. We do not give up this sense of aliveness easily.

kick the desire can down the road

Kick the desire can down the road

Kicking The Can Down The Road

One common (anxiety-deferring) wisdom says, “desire is tricky,  you’ll feel it again someday – whenever” — or some similar post-mortem. Desire declines are therefore “not a big deal”.

Yet the loss of desire is a main reason for marriages and relationships to end (often faster than people can find the maturity they need to carry on.) There’s talk of “incompatibility”, “lack of chemistry” and “love, but not in love”.

Therapy may be used in a hurry-up effort to repair desire, but that kind of personal development doesn’t play well with deadlines or being rushed.

Warm Is ‘Helpful-Not-Sufficient’ for Hot

In some desperation or confusion of the loss of “hot”, increased applications of “warm”, well-attached behavior, do not, frustratingly, revive “it” in a durable way. I consider the idea of a “dishwashing husband rewarded with sex” to be folly, unless we’re talking about erotic life involving the kitchen setting, water, soap, etc.

“Hot” needs play and imagination, opposition, non-compliance, some comfort around risk and experimentation, self-validation, transgression (of something/anything), distance, self-interest, possible/likely generosity (“GGG“), etc., not chores. Even if sharing housework represents a good relational step, it’ll rarely induce the sought-after heat (other than hot water.)


Warm Not Hot

Warm attachment sets the table for “hot”, but that’s all. Then the partners must find the separateness to sit down, order what they want, and openly, consensually-selfishly enjoy it.

It takes at least one person in the relationship(s) who’s dedicated to having a sexual self – as a matter of life (and ‘death’).  And the decency to give one’s partner(s) room and flexibility to continuously develop an erotic/sexual self too. (I always liked Marty Klein‘s simple analogy of being a “good citizen in the relationship“.)

The Great Achievement

In my thinking, keeping desire alive and kicking in committed relationships is the greatest of all personal/relational achievements – one of the rare successes in life that no one else need know. Yet nearly everyone does know when they see a relationship that still has it long after the period of early infatuation ends. Maintaining desire is defined here as always developing it.

The Safety Of Desire & Arousal

Desire is fluid. Like water on the roof, it will go wherever it can. But it thrives on a certain kind of safety. Small wonder so much human desire exists in private mental life. That’s where the real safety lies, in the inner world privacy where this part of a person can emerge and find expression.

Michael Bader brings the idea of sexual expression as a milestone of personal development, setting the stage for helping a person cope with a core, and likely well-hidden worry. I think of it as undifferentiated anxiety from family and social relationships.

carve out time

Carve Out The Time

Time must be carved out by two (or more) adults to better figure out their erotic lives. All the other scheduled events must be set aside. Desire,needs to be openly supported, developed (hopefully with much humor), acted out and cared for. Desire is fragile and must be nurtured (because adults aren’t “really” allowed to play, and so they forget how.)

 ….an abrupt ending to be sure, but to be continued…

Relationship & Couples Therapy: Can We Master Jealousy?


Therapy For Jealousy

As a relationship therapist, I want to find ways that my clients can understand and master their jealousy, reducing the damage it can cause, and facilitating a process of personal and relational development. Jealousy is a stressful signal that partner differentiation and development in both could take place. At various points in this post, I describe ways of thinking about that for actual therapy.

Evolve And Grow

Jealousy’s underlying mistrust and insecurity can contribute strongly to the decline of a relationship. However, partners can also use their jealousy to evolve and grow. The learning process usually happens in a series of painful regressions.  It often comes to whether one partner genuinely wishes to move ‘beyond’ jealousy, and lower its disorganizing anxiety.

Only A Threat

But if jealousy is experienced only as a threat – rather than as a tolerable emotional constant in a more mature relationship -a couple’s life will be harder. Your partner is not necessarily the only one responsible for your jealous reaction. The use of jealousy to manipulate one’s partner reflects the emotional fusion lying at the heart of the relationship.

What About Personal History?

What if your partner (or you) has a ‘history’ of ‘cheating’? What if one or both of you were ‘cheating’ in prior relationships, including this one? Isn’t some degree of jealousy just rational and self-protective when you or your partner have cheated in past relationships? That kind of narrative usually increases the likelihood and intensity of jealousy.

Three Levels Of Change

I like the idea of evolving or maturing beyond jealousy as a human relational concern, rather than repetitively suffering & recovering from it. Therapists should consider models of personal development that connect with social and relational change, including new social networks of all kinds.

Therapeutically, evolving and developing is not fast, easy stuff. Jealousy can be very entrenched, like a groove that’s been cut. It’s a slower moving function of both personal and relationship development. And it’s reinforced, by being socially constructed. So it’s got several levels and some complexity.


Poly Vs. Mono Jealousy

One issue to address upfront is the difference between monogamous and polyamorous (or monogamish) jealousy. Poly is designed in part to relieve jealousy by rationalizing it and making it transparent. But it doesn’t work out that easily in real life. People moving from mono to poly trade one set of jealousy and relational problems for another.

So I don’t take much time in this post for contrasting differences between poly and mono jealousies. They have many common personal elements. But Poly is intentionally re-mapping relational life, and is now a distinctly social piece of development. It’s also likely adaptive in nature.

I acknowledge that this post is often written from a couples-centric perspective. If you are non-monogamous, you could consider jealousy as a sign that clarification is needed somewhere within existing agreements, rules & limits or boundaries.

Though mainly, I am after a different goal here: a multi-level map of jealousy.

A Big Mix

It isn’t typically understood as a blend of several emotional processes.  With its various sub-types and supporting emotions, jealousy works its various ways through people’s weaker, more vulnerable sides, often at high levels of relational distress. No one seems to like the actual experience of it.

Jealousy in relationships presents fascinating connections between personal, relational and social psychologies. It’s a complex form of anxiety, so I will address each of these contexts and present a few published ideas about how this powerful dynamic, which mostly causes needless suffering, might be ‘mastered’ (outgrown via maturation.)

But before we get too theoretical here, I’m going to respond briefly to readers who came to this post seeking relief. I’ve often seen the level of anxiety that jealousy creates, and I want this blog to always be useful.

Jealous reasons

Basic Therapy You Can Do

I prefer to think about how we can learn from one another’s relationships, and I’ve addressed this in prior blog posts — here and here. Polyamory skills can be very helpful to monogamous couples. Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert have a nice protocol for managing and eventually moving beyond basic jealousy. In fact, it can be used in any relationship.

“Negotiated avoidance” vs. “growth anxiety” models

Here’s another approach, from Kathy Labriola ( I’ve added my own alternative labels to hers in the sub-header above):

“When you discover exactly what triggers your jealousy, it puts things in perspective. Realizing that you are only jealous of a small piece of the overall picture makes it much more manageable. After identifying your jealousy triggers, you have two basic choices. You can “engineer the problem away” by making agreements with your partner to avoid that particular behavior or situation, as shown in several previous examples. Or you can use the “phobia model”, taking the risk of gradually exposing yourself to situations which trigger your jealousy in the hopes that you will learn to tolerate and eventually feel comfortable with it.”

More therapy will be covered further down.  I hope your own therapy model will emerge in some ways, by looking at my multi-level “map” of jealousy.


Here are some takes on the individual psychology of jealousy:


Jealousy anticipates the fear of being alone, and its emotional component, loneliness. These fears are existential, defined as a fear directly tied to existence.  We could also say that the fear of death, the original existential ‘biggie’ is directly related. I agree, but hold that it’s a more emotional death. I cover the emotional deadness issue just a bit below.


Jealousy is a painful regression. People usually regress in the face of a new, normal developmental challenges – problems they have never solved before. Like any regression, jealousy holds the potential to become a learning/maturing experience, a differentiating step forward. Where you manage the anxiety that exists between “I” and “Us”, a differentiation struggle in essential form.

Intense Or Morbid

Intense, or morbid, jealousy is a well known individual psychopathology. It’s both the degree of genuinely negative emotional (fear of loss), and behavioral disturbance (“protective” actions taken against possible loss.)

This type of jealousy has many moving parts: low self esteem, feelings of inadequacy, intense anxiety, self-protection, wounded trust, shame, dependency, attachment processes, low self-confidence, and chronic or acute emotional insecurity. High levels of neurologic stress result in disorganized perceptions, even delusions.

Texting jealous


In attachment theory, jealousy expresses the “anxious-preoccupied” type, which often leads to relationship partners getting stuck in a wounded, competitive, and early stage of development. I can see jealousy coming from a damaged, regressive attachment, where the importance of “the other person” to one’s sense of self is highly elevated. It usually presumes that the partner is there to “make” us feel alive at any time, as well as fulfill all other primary duties. This kind of attention to one another is a ‘sticky bind’, making it more difficult for the partnership to differentiate, especially via their erotic/sexual growth.


The bigger problem is that they will have greater difficulty differentiating, a move that would improve things sexually and mature the partners. Assisting partners through this stage is a task of differentiation-based therapy.

David Schnarch, describing one of his trainings, wrote: “”…affairs involve balancing the inherent tension between two sociobiological forces: We are a sexually gregarious species that also values pair-bonding. Differentiation, in this case, is your ability to tolerate, balance, and handle these two powerful drives.” (2014)

Hardwired, Genetic

Some hold that jealousy is “human” or “natural”, neurologically hardwired in a high percentage of humanity (which may lead some to search for, and ‘discover’ the ‘jealousy gene’.) Of course, differences in personal neurology affect how successfully people develop their intimate relationships. This belief is similar to the naturalist view of jealousy, that it’s a universally experienced human anxiety, literally existential (fundamental to the human condition) in nature. Veaux and Ricker realistically explore this and how to improve it in “More Than Two

Reducing To Self-Diagnosis

Many relationships begin with two ‘cheating’ (or non-transparent) partners from their existing relationships. Either partner may have both relationship and family histories of infidelity, leading to divorce. This gives rise to self-diagnosis as a “jealous person” or a “serial cheater”. This oversimplifies and reduces things, and diminishes personal responsibility for actual jealous or “philandering” behaviors.



I’ll review a range of perspectives about relational sources of jealousy. This will lead to a broader social discussion.

Relational DNA

Jealousy is seen by some as inevitable in human relationships. Possession and competition both run deeply in humans. Attachment to others clearly involves possession. I often think of it rooted in our deepest neuronal memory (consider how newborns grasp.)

The “Third Person”

I’m referring to the fact that all (or 99%) monogamous relationships confront in some way the recurrent (or constant) phenomenon of the “third person.” [A less couples-centric term might be “other” or “new” person.] These “persons” always exist, or are created by the relationship partners in various ways.

Someone else, from one or both partners’ past or present, enters the emotional field of the relationship. Third parties (per Adam Phillips, author of Monogamy) accurately reveal the basic level of desire in a marriage, and other truths too. Some relationships may be highly reactive/poorly differentiated, others might take it more like an indifferent acceptance. And there may be accommodation of the “other”, also known as “poly”.

Found your texts


The behavioral response to a jealousy regression commonly takes the form of a parent/child dynamic, and it’s about loss of control. Partners can play “cop” or “detective” to one another. It’s like having live-in police; your partner becomes your parent, always one step behind, a frustrated relationship rescuer.

Never Jealous?

If jealousy were completely absent from a relationship, one might wonder if the partners are overly tolerant or accommodating, or even dissociative. Jealousy might be universal to committed relationships, because problems of attachment and possession are ‘normal.’

Deliberate Jealousy

Jealousy can be seen as a typical and constant dynamic that relationships tend to bring out in people.  In fact partners sometimes deliberately create jealousy, to manipulate the other partner to re-commit, often for the sake of their (sexual) relationship. This is a competitive regression (which can be very exciting, like all competition, a/k/a “the chase.”) On a good day, this can lead to mind-blowing (and make-up) sex.

Kills Or Warps Sex

The dually destructive nature of jealousy is that it either strangles eroticism between the partners, or distorts it. There’s either not enough emotionally positive or imaginative space left in which to have fun, loving and interesting sex. Or, it can fuel anxiety-based sexuality, propping up a partner after a bout of insecurity.

jealous anger

Dependency Leads To Hostility

Jealousy expresses a profound dependency, therefore a huge emotional vulnerability. That stems from the fear of internal deadness, emptiness and/or rejection. The other partner is held as the source of happiness, to which one is entitled. A franchise is gradually imposed on that person’s time. This can only result in deep disappointment.

Fear Of Deadness

At the adult level, it’s a fear of deprivation – of feeling fully alive. Once that dependent deadness is experienced as threatening to a partner, emotional withdrawal/distancing is a common  response. Jealousy is the other. Both are regressive defenses against deepening the intimacy and expanding the relationship. What’s missing? Mutual trust, defined as:

“Knowing that you can’t know everything about your partner. And being OK with that” (thanks again to Esther Perel.)

Trust & Self-Love

Also absent is self-validation, when an individual fundamentally knows he or she is lovable, whether loved or not by another adult. That secure state of self-love is not solely measured by what’s reflected from another person (Thanks here to David Schnarch, and the construct of the reflected sense of self.) As covered more below, this stance in some form is nearly necessary if one is living within the emerging social context of polyamory. A robust individuality is needed to live in a distinctly “relational” way.

Discussed Monogamy Lately?

As far as mastering jealousy, relationships that are able to thoroughly discuss the rigors of monogamy – as the commitment to each other develops – give themselves a distinct advantage against it reaching toxic levels.

So many other aspects of commitment are discussed by partners, but the actual rigors of exclusive fidelity are not often among them! The subject is so threatening for people that they bypass it altogether, opting for a broad and unrealistic taboo on discussion, as if it were a sacred cow.

It’s actually the elephant in the room. Jealousy can often be traced to a lack of mutual erotic awareness, which itself speaks to the level of both differentiation and overall development in a relationship.

Rite Of Passage

Jealousy may be a relational “rite of passage”. A single, sudden incident can drive a crisis, which the partners then mature in. It signals a stage of development forward, or not. The flip side is that jealousy can also kill relationships strictly on the strength of its anxiety. No one has to be actually discovered in an ‘affair’.

Couples, From A Social Perspective

As a lead-in to the next section on social perspectives, I offer Esther Perel‘s views on jealousy from the perspective of a couple in society:

“the couple has become the bulwark, the safe haven against all the insecurities away from a much larger community in which people had their needs met by a large network {bold added} and the couple was one interaction but not the central interaction, the organizing principle of our mythic and practical life. That today is the new marriage I would say.”

Laura Kacere has a take on couples in a social context, as she wrote in Everyday Feminism:

“When we see love as scarce, we are taught to see others outside of our relationship as potential competitors. Often, these are people of our same gender. Women, especially, are conditioned by our culture to see other women as their competitors.But we don’t have to see others in this way. In polyamory, there is ideally a freedom from this way of thinking that can also be very liberating. It can be hard to do, especially at first, but when you work to humanize the people your partner is interested in, seeing them as allies rather than rivals, you are liberated from having to be territorial and can come to see everyone around you in a different light.”



We should know that predominant social views on monogamy and sexual exclusivity contribute to how people handle this issue in their relationships. Yet by looking at new ways of orienting ourselves socially, we may find additional ways to master jealousy.

Competitive Vs. Communal

I was intrigued by a recent article. I join the consensus that says it’s poorly written, yet still found its central idea intriguing: that personal jealousy is reinforced by a culture which values rugged individualism.

The author runs several victory laps with her enviable oh-so-not-jealous poly experience, as a springboard for her points of view about how to master jealousy. I think the real questions are not about ‘polyamory’. Despite its many flaws as a piece of writing, it does offer a glimmer of thinking and living differently about jealousy, asking questions like these:

  • Does living within a more deeply collaborative framework of social support undercut the formation of jealousy?
  • Does human collaboration counteract our most competitive or acquisitive traits and tendencies?
  • Does a wider and/or deeper involvement in the lives of others facilitate the breathing space in relationships that allows desire to develop or maintain more easily?

Many Americans are convinced of their rugged individualism, or have otherwise been politically frightened off the idea of such a collective society. When there’s competition amongst adults for any resource, be it money, property or intimate partners, relationships more easily break down, due to competitive-type regressions (like “cop/detective”)

No “One And Only”

In terms of personal development, this more collective way fits a relational stance that does not believe in a “one and only” approach to partner selection. No one person has to satisfy all desires. Security and adventure in a relationship isn’t easily provided by the same person (Perel). We increasingly live in a choice-based world, where access to others on some level is easy to achieve.

Tend & Befriend

Collaboration & cooperation is an alternative to competitive and fight-or-flight models described above. It’s similar to “tend and befriend“.  Adults who think and operate in a range of social networks trust those connections to provide for their needs and wants

So, the theory goes that adults who increase their level of social connection, are better insulated from competitive or possessive pressure, and better positioned to experience lower levels of jealous anxiety than the culture of constant competition. Networks with real relational viability

New Networks

  • Can we believe that having very robust social support would grant us access to “sufficient” personal resources?
  • Can we rely on collective and collaborative networks of people to meet our desires and needs?

The internet of course facilitates these connections, and to an unprecedented degree. The newest generation of adults has been effectively raised on it.

Therapy Connection

I do agree that the American social environment has become in some ways more isolated, fragmented and interpersonally less comfortable. There is a tension between a socially-based alternative to jealousy and, a therapy approach (relational therapy), which often seeks a more “individualized” solution.


I will leave you with lyrics from the recent song from Beyonce Knowles, Jealous